What are your unpopular opinions in pokemon?

I agree, but what is happening now is that this also turns into a witch-hunt where every non gem mint box and booster is over scrutinized because some collectors see damaged boxes as an opportunity to flex their knowledge by pointing out every teensy-weensy imperfection and deeming them suspect. Old school collectors roll their eyes, intermediate and new collectors have their fears amplified and follow it blindly. The result? Gem mint/royal provenance or bust, which was bullshit even in 1999. Vigilance, yes, but we should not encourage Stalin-esque paranoia.

That’s different.

Here’s my thread attempt on the matter: www.elitefourum.com/t/the-legitimacy-of-sealed-booster-boxes-going-forward/30222/1
This thread didn’t really produce much. Some decent responses here and there. I probably formulated myself somewhat poorly in the OP, and I had a low post count at the time so I got the usual “new guy”-treatment despite trying to explain the issue at hand. This is how serious this matter is taken by the community (or maybe it’s just mentally avoided out of fear?). Like-fishing, condescension, derailing, one decent mini-conversation killed in the crib and a lot of fear being projected onto me. I gave up pretty quick. No-one has a clue how to deal with it, not the collectors, not the authenticators, not the grading companies, no-one has a clue (and if they do they keep it to themselves until they’ve trademarked it).

1 Like