Not sure if this has been post before if so please lock or delete. I don’t have a large sample pool but am I crazy or does it seem like CGC grading is better than BGS grading in the lower numbers?
I know it has been mentioned that some BGS 8.5 or lower grades can equal to a PSA 4 or 5 but looking at some CGC the cards looks a lot cleaner at the same grade than BGS
BGS has different grading parameters for their lower grades, they are not consistent with PSA. When people claim they are equal or they grade harsher it is disingenuous I think a lot of people get caught out by this and it is not BGS’s fault. It is still probably too early to make an overall judgement for CGC.
Agree with this completely. CGC’s grading scale for 1-6 makes the most sense to me (although I’m still learning the nuances) as PSA’s has always made little sense for those grades (except for psa 1 everything else seems pretty arbitrary) and bgs seems like throwing a dart at a number for those grades.
its interesting on cgc slabs, because my exact first thought is: would this get the same grade at PSA? I’ve sent in cards to PSA i felt were solid 10’s and they come back 9’s. you could have a great cgc card and it come back a 9 on PSA. Becket 10’s and black labels seem the hardest to get, but the risk is always floating in your mind that if you break a card out of anything, you may never get back the grade it earned to begin with, let alone keep a grade if you send to a different company. it can be done, i’m just not sure the odds of success. if you were looking for arbitrage, you’d likely want to work backwards. take a psa 9 and crack it, see if it gets a cgc 10. extremely risky, but as others have pointed out, if you want your graded cards back any time soon, PSA is going to let you down.