Thanks for that. Yes, there is–you refund them, block them, and re-list the item. I don’t like to do this, and ebay sure doesn’t want me to do this since they want new buyers and everyone has to start somewhere. Plus I have to essentially lie and say the item isn’t available anymore since you have to select a drop down option, and then when I re-list it, it’s pretty obvious the item still is available. In this case I did what I always do–emailed the buyer and asked them to verify their shipping info, and if they don’t reply I refund them and re-list. In this case the guy emailed me back with his info that was also reflected on ebay so I went ahead and proceeded with it.
There are a few issues with Managed Payments I have so far–one is that when PayPal was taking payments, I had the ability to call PayPal and do some inquiring about the payment method, address info, and if there were any red flags. eBay doesn’t allow me to “see” anything at all about the buyer or how they paid–at least as far as I can tell. And even in this case they would not even share with me why exactly the buyer was banned. But then when someone files with their financial institution, eBay wants to step back and say, “hey, it’s not us, it’s between you and the buyer and their financial institution.” However, they would not provide me the information I needed to contact the financial institution directly or find out WHO the buyer is. Their account doesn’t exist anymore, so I have no idea who I’m even contesting with for sure. I suspect eBay is either overrun with these type of disputes, or they just default to the buyer instead of actually looking at everything and making a case to the institution on my behalf. I have a big problem with this since eBay should be either “in” or “out,” and if they aren’t going to “really” be involved, they need to provide me with basic information so I can do my own follow up.
I think eBay is in reality probably trying to work out the kinks of what their process actually is since Managed Payments began. With more new ebay users and volume, which strains their resources and ability to do thorough work, as well as probably trying to avoid any confidentiality disclosure issues, they need to maintain their iron clad grip of their legal ability to freeze your funds and forcibly withdraw funds from you. I would love to know at what rate their claims have increased, since once the word is out, the fraudsters show up in droves. And in this case, after all, who is it easier to get money from–me with an active account and my bank info and their strong arm agreements (if you don’t like it, don’t sell on our platform essentially), or a buyer they have banned who is engaging in fraud and has who knows what type of sketchy payment stuff going on? I believe they probably just default to the buyer as they did here, with little real research. And if only 50% of the people fight them on it, they are money ahead by not instead trying to prove fraud and get their money back from a user that has been banned and THEIR financial institution. This way they get their money from the surest source, which is me. All I can do is try and get them to do the right thing and if they won’t, stop cutting them in on my sales and stop buying off ebay.
People have gotten screwed MUCH worse for a lot more money than $300+, but it is pretty disheartening how easy it is to have someone with ZERO credibility win a case over someone who has a flawless track record over 20 years. Pretty pathetic.