Is it better (value-wise) to have Mitsuhiro Arita sign right on the surface of a card, or on its PSA slab? This card will be for my personal collection, not for selling.
As @pottsinator, said, its really a preference thing here. I plan to crack my psa cases of two of my favorite cards (dark typhlosion and dark raichu psa 9) because Id really love for them to be physically signed and then recased. The case to me would be nice, but id rather not run the risk of it ever smearing off being that I truly want my cards to always hold the signature. But again, to each their own!
The card is already slabbed. I’m almost afraid of damaging it if I take it out, hence my curiosity about what there is to gain by having the card itself signed.
Card signed. I believe it’s more personal and means more when you’re willing to put ink to a card rather than on a slab. It shows you value the signature and where it’s from.
If its an expensive card then sign the slab, If its a cheap card, sign the card. If you ever sell the card in the future and its an expensive card, your limiting your buyer pool since auto collecting is a niche market.
Imo its a nitche and a risky move, it’s better to sign the case to satisfy both sides, if you want to sell in the future. But the inner Yolo in me does say go for the card.
Arita signs a lot more than Fukuda. You can list a card for anything you want, doesn’t mean it will sell. Personally if I were to buy a signed card for a high markup, it better not be personalized. I think Fukuda is the only artist that has mandatory personalization so thats already a very limited market.