Pokémon’s Rarest Error “No Edition” 1st Ed Base Clefairy

General
1

Cigar Hitmonlee…Move over. I finally decided to share what I consider the rarest of all errors.
Note: The edition stamp isn’t there(edit lol):open_mouth::open_mouth::open_mouth::open_mouth::open_mouth::open_mouth::open_mouth::open_mouth::open_mouth:

2 Likes
2

:thinking::thinking::thinking:

2 Likes
3

I’m Confused…

I can see that near perfect circle where 1st Ed. Stamp would have gone - but weren’t Shadowless and 1st Ed. printed together with 1st Ed. Stamp added to Shadowless Cards?

4

They’re*

5 Likes
5

There :wink:

8 Likes
6

Fail

3 Likes
7

That’s the joke guys -.-

8 Likes
8

Is that you btoise?

13 Likes
9

Inb4 SHADOWLESS IS THE FIRST PRINTED SHEET comment

10

Just for comparison sake, here’s one “with” the edition stamp and what it’s supposed to look like.

11

Actually that’s a Charizard, not a Clefairy.

6 Likes
12

@pkmnflyingmaster,

So you would assume. But are you sure?

13

To be perfectly honest, I’m not quite sure about anything in this thread so far :sweat_smile:

6 Likes
14

@pkmnflyingmaster,

Nice post count (2222)

1 Like
15

I remember you when you were only 1111

1 Like
16

Actually, it’s those blue question marks that somehow extend beyond the card itself that makes it valuable. :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

2 Likes
17

I’m going with this is a Shadowless error and not a 1st edition error.

18

I personally think this is a shadowed card which lacks the shadow!! Anyone else???

4 Likes
19

We can’t know for certain, until we see the back of the card

2 Likes
20

My uncle works for Nintendo and held that card in his hands; it contained no shadow on the back. Lack-of-shadow back confirmed!

We could call this the ‘It’s-supposed-to-have-a-shadow-but-hasn’t’-edition? Anyone?

1 Like