Hi e4 mates. It’s been a week contacting you. Only a few responded on my non-damaging moves forum . Looks like that tier list is too big to react . Ok now I come with the tier list of variants. (way smaller than my previous tier ) . I truly love few forms and hate few as the same. So I made the tier list on my opinion. You can all give your opinions on it. Have fun
the only ones i really dislike are g-stunfisk and a-persian
the amount of a-exeggutor cards we get makes me want to put it lower, but i’ll compromise with C tier since its design is pretty funny. i just wish it took less slots in the TCG lol
overall, i really like the regional variant concept. probably my favorite type of update to a preexisting design that they’ve done. it has produced some really nice results like g-zapdos (personal fav of these) and more widely popular designs like the a-ninetales/vulpix and g-moltres
If it’s solely on design I accept avalugg’s position, but the thought of the typing they gave to its form i actually though it wasn’t that bad. Like the rock type addition made more meaning to it.
G. Ponyta and G. Rapidash confuses me a lot… One time I see them I feel like “ohh wow a perfect unicorn design it’s great” and the other time I see them it’s like “oh man it’s so heavily designed which is not that needed”. I confused so much while placing them in my tier also