Serializaiton should NEVER come to Pokemon

So… I know people think my takes may be “controversial” especially on the discord, but… let’s start:

I’d imagine almost everyone is aware that MTG did serialized with their The Brother’s War set and now the LOTR set will feature a 1/1 ring. A lot of talk has been going on (“noise”) and the key takeaway question I hear is: “What if Pokémon made serialized cards?”

WOTC / Hasbro’s Chapter: Beginning of the End
I believe MTG is dying, tbh idk how much longer IRL playing card game life span has specifically in competitive. If you ask me, I have never met a single teenager and/or kid (zoomer as I like to say) who is interested in MTG in any capacity, however when you ask if I have seen kids or teenagers who love Pokémon, there’s so many who love and enjoy Pokemon whether its cards, video game, toys, etc. Pokémon is approx. 97.5% (made up statistic) card collectors with 2.5% player-base, while MTG is the complete opposite. I believe that Hasbro / WOTC is trying to create artificial demand and get consumers to get interested into collecting rather than playing. We are currently in a technology revolution and it’s only going to keep growing at exponential rates (ChatGPT, Bard, Autonomous vehicles/robots/computers, etc) where technologgy is so advanced that digital will take over a lot higher percentage of our dailyhood in the next 5-10 with social media being a good example in recent years. I believe we will eventually get to a point where playing card games especially at tournament levels will enter a drought and that may be MTG’s last breath unless they can turn more players into collectors with serialization, but I think you already understand where I’m coming from here…

Toxic Environment
Serialization is unhealthy because it creates artificial scarcity and demand. It can also shift the health of a product especially if there are only single digit serializations. For example even if a card were to have unattractive artwork, but the card is from a popular IP and is a 1/1 serialized card; there will be demand due to the rarity, price, and potentially even the Internet Clout you earn from owning such a “rare” card. Now let’s get to product health, if we have a 1/1 card or 1/10 or another small sized serialization and we are able to track down every single number or the 1/1 has already been pulled: the demand for that product is more than likely to significantly drop as the chase is over and people will have ill feeling towards a set due to the chase no longer existing and will most likely no longer buy that peoduct. I pray that Pokémon does not take this idea from Magic as the current state of Pokémon is overall healthy.

Misconceptions of Scarcity and Demand:
Serialization will create a false sense of demand as the majority of collectors or “participants” in the hobby want the next best thing (Moonbreon is a good example, but this is another topic for another day). There could be this insane Pikachu art 1/500 card that is serialized and comes out, but 1 year later a new Pikachu that is 1/500 with significantly better artwork comes out and the demand switches and may lead to a dump of the original as these “next best thing” collectors would not be able to hold more than 1 card, hell I’d say a lot of collectors today that own a PSA 10 Moonbreon, actually cannot afford it as most Americans cannot afford a random $600 expense as the average American credit card debt is quite high. On another note, serialization will create unnatural pumps and people are bound to get burned and end up having terrible experiences in the hobby. Serialization will exclusive at the beginning, but with longevity the true colors show that its just “rarity” with extra unneeded steps.

TLDR: Serialization creates an unnatural demand and if Pokemon creates serialized cards from sets, it will create a downfall of popularity due to a high chance of getting burned and many bad experiences to come with a false sense of scarcity.

image
Don’t let Pikachu cry, say no to serialized cards - Triple

8 Likes

I actually don’t mind something like a small amount of cards prob not 1 but v v limited. It’ll give those who can’t afford the higher priced stuff a chance at owning something or selling to own something that’s always been out of reach for them. Not the popular view but it’s my take.

1 Like

I respect your opinion, but Pikachu is crying

2 Likes

They got rid of 1st edition so I don’t see any reason why they would go down the road of serialised cards. Pokemon will just keep doing what they’re doing and who can blame them it’s a successful model

2 Likes

I have heard people say that MTG is dying since I started playing in 2016. However, it’s literally more popular now, with a larger player base, than any other time over the past 30 years. I agree with you on all your takes on serialization, but I just don’t see evidence of MTG’s popularity decreasing in any substantial way. Your opinions seem to be a little more based on anecdotal evidence in that regard. A friend in my playgroup runs an MTG club at a highschool where he teaches. He has over 100 active players, and it’s the biggest club the school ever had.

3 Likes

This seems to be very hard to prove yes? I can say for sure, my workplace has a weekly games night and most of the people are MTG players. We also have people who have quick magic games during the lunch breaks with like a small group of clueless people like me gathering around just to see what is going on. However, I do not know if this is true for the teenager / zoomer demographic.

I think artwork is still subjective yes? I think this and this threads prove that. You see a nice and healthy distribution of cards which are extremely rare but no outright favorites.

Lastly, I think it would be extremely hilarious if somebody buys a booster box with the one serialized card and just never opens it. Or if some person who opens it and has no idea of the value and never talks / posts about it. But business wise, if this is a 1 of 1 in the world, as a company, I would never release it and just milk the customers speculating and trying to open products. Unless there are X number of booster boxes which will be printed, you can always keep printing and re-printing and cite the low percentage chance of the card being pulled.

Nice topic though. Thanks!

Cheers!

1 Like

It got more popular with Covid, yes I agree. But… I still think that irl card games are definitely not the future and MTG product is always on shelf while my Pokemon product at the shopes are gone, of course this is anecdotal. I believe WOTC is trying to get collectors to get into MTG as it is majority players

yea theres a lot of random scenarios with serialized, the health of products will be super volatile due to the possibility of it still out there or if its out of the pool.

Artwork is subjective ya, but what I meant was a general consensus, for example start of SwSh people were chasing Pika Vmax Rainbow and now there is barely any talk on it and its all eyes on Umbreon, aka the next best thing.

1 Like

Same energy.

1 Like

Doesn’t serialisation already exist in subtle ways? Things like top 32 cards or the 3,000 japanese eeveelutions that were printed?

It is true, but it is more like an assured serialization / rarity. Meaning, if you applied for a lottery of the eeveelution promos, everyone had a fair and equal shot at winning the lottery. Even in case of limited numbered promos, there is an assured way to obtain the card, given enough resources and connections. Incase of a serialized card in a pack which has to be pulled, that too only 1/1, there is no way to guarantee, even if you have unlimited resources that you will get that card before it is pulled by someone.

Cheers!